Tech Support
Documentation
Login
Contact Us
Key Takeaways
- Vulnerability patching is critical — over 60% of breaches exploit known flaws that already had patches available.
- Patch management is a core component of vulnerability management, covering discovery, testing, deployment, and documentation.
- TuxCare’s KernelCare Enterprise automates security patching for Linux kernels without reboots or downtime.
One of the most critical yet often overlooked aspects of cybersecurity is the timely patching of vulnerabilities. While much attention is given to sophisticated phishing attacks and the menace of password brute-forcing, the importance of addressing unpatched vulnerabilities cannot be overstated, especially for Linux admins in cybersecurity managing large-scale environments.
These vulnerabilities represent low-hanging fruit for cybercriminals, offering a relatively straightforward path into systems.
Yet, time and time again, industry reports highlight a worrying trend: organizations are failing to patch vulnerabilities promptly, leaving themselves exposed to significant risks.
What Is Vulnerability Patching?
Vulnerability patching is the process of fixing security flaws in software or systems before attackers can exploit them.
It involves applying updates and fixes released by software vendors to address known security flaws. Given its relative simplicity and high impact, timely patching should be a top priority for any cybersecurity strategy.
Vulnerability Management vs. Patch Management
Patch management is just one part of a broader process called vulnerability management. While patching focuses on fixing known issues, vulnerability management covers the full lifecycle — from detection to remediation and verification.
Vulnerability Management
Vulnerability management is the proactive, end-to-end process of securing systems against weaknesses. It includes discovering vulnerabilities, evaluating their potential impact, prioritizing remediation efforts (including patching), and confirming the fixes.
Patch Management
Patch management, on the other hand, is the act of applying the necessary updates to fix known vulnerabilities. It’s a critical component of vulnerability management.
|
Aspect |
Vulnerability Management |
Patch Management |
|
Scope |
Broad: discovery to remediation |
Narrow: applying security updates |
|
Involves |
Scanning, prioritization, mitigation |
Patch testing, deployment, verification |
|
Goal |
Reduce overall risk |
Fix known flaws |
|
Tools |
Scanners (e.g. OpenVAS, Nessus) |
Patch tools (e.g. dnf, apt, KernelCare Enterprise) |
|
Frequency |
Continuous |
Regular or ad hoc updates |
Vulnerability Patching Challenges
One might wonder why organizations struggle with patching known vulnerabilities, especially given the severe consequences of neglect. The 2024 Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) by Verizon revealed that enterprise patch management cycles “typically stabilize around 30 to 60 days for most vulnerabilities, with a target of 15 days for critical ones. However, this timeline often fails to keep pace with the rapid scanning and exploitation activities of threat actors.”
This delay in patching is not just a logistical challenge but a strategic oversight that exposes organizations to preventable risks. And this data is just for vulnerabilities present in CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities, meaning the ones already identified in the wild, as being in use by threat actors.
The Downtime Dilemma
Critical patches often necessitate reboots, causing service interruptions and user impact. This frequently results in postponing essential updates, even for critical vulnerabilities in live production systems.
Lack of Visibility
Without proper vulnerability scanning and asset inventory, outdated software and kernel components can easily be overlooked. The 2024 DBIR’s survival analysis of vulnerability management data showed that “it takes around 55 days to remediate 50% of critical vulnerabilities once patches are available.” Alarmingly, by the end of a year, about “8% of these vulnerabilities remain unpatched.”
Manual Processes
Relying on manual checks and command-line execution for patching is error-prone and lacks scalability. This approach makes it challenging to maintain consistent security across a growing number of systems.
Best Practices for Effective Vulnerability Patching
Effective patching isn’t just about applying updates — it’s about doing it safely, quickly, and consistently. These best practices help minimize risk, reduce downtime, and keep your Linux systems hardened against known threats.
1. Automate Patching
Use tools like unattended-upgrades or dnf-automatic to automate security updates. Automation ensures consistency and keeps systems protected without waiting for manual action.
For kernel-level patching, tools like KernelCare Enterprise eliminate the need for reboots while applying critical fixes automatically — making it ideal for production servers.
2. Prioritize by Risk
Focus first on CVEs with high severity, public exploits, or exposed services. TuxCare Radar streamlines this process with AI-powered risk analysis that combines CVSS scoring, patch availability, and real-time threat intelligence. It gives you clear, expert-level prioritization so you can patch what matters most — fast.
3. Test in Staging
Never deploy patches blindly. Always validate updates in a staging or development environment that mirrors production. This catches compatibility issues early and reduces the chance of service disruptions.
4. Maintain an Inventory
Keep a clear, up-to-date inventory of all systems, installed packages, and kernel versions. Tools like Ansible, Rudder, or GLPI help track patch status and system configurations across your infrastructure.
5. Document and Audit
Maintain detailed logs of all patching actions — what was patched, when, and by whom. Auditing provides essential records for compliance, accountability, and efficient troubleshooting of any post-update issues.
Patch & Vulnerability Management Policies: Why Every Organization Needs One
A patch and vulnerability management policy defines how, when, and by whom vulnerabilities are addressed. It sets clear goals, patch frequency, systems in scope, and assigned responsibilities. Without one, patching becomes reactive and inconsistent.
Compliance with standards like NIST, ISO 27001, or HIPAA also requires documented patching practices. A well-written policy streamlines audits and reduces risk during team changes or security incidents.
Why Unpatched Vulnerabilities Are a Prime Attack Vector
The 2024 Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) by Verizon underscored a troubling rise in the exploitation of unpatched vulnerabilities. That report noted a substantial “180% increase in attacks leveraging these weaknesses as entry points compared to the previous year.” This surge was primarily driven by ransomware and extortion-related threat actors, who found these unpatched systems to be easy targets.
Recent findings from the 2025 DBIR further support this ongoing trend, highlighting a 34% increase in the exploitation of vulnerabilities as an initial attack vector. There’s a significant emphasis on zero-day exploits targeting perimeter devices and VPNs. Vulnerability exploitation has now solidified as the #2 most (ab)used entry point (20%), closely following credential abuse (22%) and ahead of phishing (16%).
Image from 2025 DBIR by Verizon
A notable example is the MOVEit vulnerability, which saw threat actors exploiting a zero-day vulnerability in file management software. This incident alone affected a diverse range of organizations, with the education sector being the hardest hit.
The attackers, identified as the Cl0p ransomware group, used the vulnerability to exfiltrate data, demonstrating the devastating potential of unpatched software.
Why Timely Patching Is the Simplest Way to Improve Security
Addressing unpatched vulnerabilities should be considered the low-hanging fruit of cybersecurity. Unlike phishing attacks, which exploit human behavior, or password brute-forcing, which is also related to human behavior such as not using stronger passwords or failing to deploy multi-factor authentication (MFA), patching is a straightforward, technologically feasible measure.
Yet, the DBIR highlights a concerning disconnect: despite the technological feasibility, many organizations fail to prioritize patching. This failure is not due to a lack of awareness but often a result of resource constraints, operational disruptions, and a reactive rather than proactive security posture.
While a deterrent to traditional patching methods, there are, already, technologies like live patching that completely avoid the disruption problems while providing faster time-to-mitigation in most enterprise environments.
Moving Forward: Proactive Vulnerability Management
To mitigate the risks associated with unpatched vulnerabilities, organizations must adopt a more proactive approach to vulnerability management best practices. This involves several key strategies:
1. Accelerate Patch Cycles
Organizations should strive to reduce the time taken to apply patches, particularly for critical vulnerabilities. This might involve leveraging cybersecurity automation to streamline parts of the patch management process and ensure quicker response times.
2. Enhance Vulnerability Scanning
Regular and comprehensive vulnerability scanning can help identify potential weaknesses before they are exploited. This proactive measure allows organizations to address issues promptly.
3. Prioritize Based on Risk
Not all vulnerabilities pose the same level of risk. Organizations should prioritize patching based on the potential impact and exploitability of the vulnerability, focusing first on those that pose the greatest threat.
4. Vendor Accountability
Hold software vendors accountable for the security of their products. This includes demanding timely patches and updates and choosing vendors with a strong security track record.
5. Continuous Education and Training
Educate IT and security teams on the importance of timely patching and keep them updated on the latest vulnerabilities and threats.
Why Vulnerability Patching Matters More Than Ever
The rise of unpatched vulnerabilities as a significant attack vector highlights a critical area where many organizations fall short. While phishing and brute-forcing attacks capture headlines, the silent threat of unpatched software continues to grow, echoing one of the top cybersecurity trends highlighted in recent industry research.
By recognizing the importance of timely patching and adopting proactive vulnerability management practices, organizations can significantly enhance their security posture and protect themselves against preventable breaches.
Download the Enterprise Leader’s Guide to Cybersecurity Resilience to see how KernelCare live patching automates Linux security updates in real time — without reboots or disruption.
Frequently Asked Questions:
1. How often should I patch vulnerabilities?
Typically, you should patch critical vulnerabilities immediately, and apply routine updates weekly or monthly depending on your environment and risk level. Don’t delay high-severity fixes.
2. What tools help automate patch management?
TuxCare’s KernelCare Enterprise helps automate kernel patching for Linux distributions, ensuring critical security patches are deployed as soon as they are available.
3. Is patching enough to secure my environment?
No. While patching is essential, it should be a part of your comprehensive security strategy. You should also implement other best security practices to secure your environment.
